LandmAIn

LandmAIn · GIS map atlas

See how infrastructure shapes the land opportunity.

Explore Colorado's eastern Denver metro corridor through four connected maps. Power, fiber, parcel characteristics, and land-use context come together to help development teams focus their site research.

Explore the interactive mapDiscuss a site

01 · Corridor thesis

Power + fiber backbone

Corridor map showing fiber evidence in blue, 115+ kV transmission and substations in orange, highways in dark gray, and the priority corridor in green.
Watkins and Bennett north through Hudson and Keenesburg. Select the map to view it at full size.

The corridor brings eastern Denver metro land into a shared view of regional power, fiber, and transportation infrastructure.

  • Transmission lines, substations, fiber corridor evidence, and I-70 / I-76 provide the regional context for site comparison.
  • Each location is evaluated for its land-use pathway, power connection options, fiber access, and water strategy.
  • Provider coordination establishes the capacity and service options available to a specific project.
A corridor-wide view helps development teams connect regional infrastructure with the land-use, utility, and water questions that shape each site.

Sources: HIFLD transmission and substations; CDOT highways and fiber-segment evidence; EPA water-system context; county parcels.

02 · Opportunity field

A focused order for site review

Parcel ranking map with lower scores in gray, middle scores in light green, higher scores in dark green, and the north-east queue outlined in blue.
One hundred large-parcel screens and a twelve-case manual review queue. Select the map to view it at full size.

A consistent screening framework helps teams compare large parcels and prioritize the next investigation.

  • Color represents the comparative public-data score. Numbered markers identify the manual review sequence.
  • Green markers identify front-review cases; blue identifies comparison cases; red and orange identify review and policy holds.
  • Zoning, community context, aviation, and site-control evidence shape which opportunities advance.
The ranking directs research toward the sites and questions that deserve attention first. Market value and investment quality are assessed through subsequent diligence.

Sources: County parcel geometry; official zoning and municipal context; derived infrastructure distances; policy-aware review queue.

03 · Parcel evidence

From regional context to local detail

Local parcel map showing a recorded 76-acre tract outline, modeled slope cells, nearby fiber and transmission, mapped easements, and aviation context.
Terrain, access context, mapped easements, and aviation overlays. Select the map to view it at full size.

Parcel-level review connects infrastructure relationships with the physical and recorded details of an individual location.

  • The broader 493-acre screen includes 110 USGS 3DEP samples and a modeled mean slope of 2.8%.
  • An official 2026 deed records a 76-acre site within that review envelope. The displayed tract extent is derived from the deed.
  • The coarse terrain model places 493 broader-screen acres at or below 5% slope. Survey, drainage, and geotechnical work refine the development footprint.
  • Recorded-tract boundary distances are 1.46 miles to fiber evidence, 0.75 miles to transmission, and 1.38 miles to a public water-system boundary.
The local screen organizes the next diligence work: survey, drainage, geotechnical assessment, title, legal access, and direct provider coordination. Mapped distances identify connection leads; service requires provider confirmation.

Sources: USGS 3DEP; Aurora aerial, zoning, street, right-of-way/easement, airport and noise GIS; HIFLD/CDOT infrastructure context.

04 · Policy and constraints

Understand the development pathway

Constraint map showing policy review areas, rezoning requirements, flood and water context, airports, and the numbered site review queue.
Policy posture, flood and protected-land context, water boundaries, schools, and airports. Select the map to view it at full size.

Land-use and environmental context give each opportunity a clearer development agenda.

  • Public GIS highlights mapped constraints and potential service relationships for closer review.
  • Weld Agricultural zoning carries a policy hold while the applicable land-use pathway is evaluated.
  • Jurisdiction, zoning, flood coverage, protected lands, and aviation context guide the sequence of agency and provider discussions.
A useful site screen connects the opportunity to the approvals, technical studies, and service confirmations needed to advance it.

Sources: FEMA flood hazards; PAD-US protected lands; EPA public water boundaries; Colorado schools and airports; Aurora/Weld policy screens.

Bring the next site question into focus.

These maps present retained public-source screening snapshots. Utility capacity, carrier service, entitlement, water availability, buildable acreage, title, legal access, site control, and investment viability are established through project-specific verification.

Talk with LandmAInCompare the five site profiles