LandmAInThe LandmAIn briefing
Find the land where infrastructure and opportunity align.
Compare eastern Denver metro parcels by acreage, distance to infrastructure, zoning and the approvals a project would need.
A connected view of the eastern Denver metro.
The current study follows the corridor from Watkins and Bennett north through Hudson and Keenesburg. LandmAIn brings transmission, substations, fiber corridor evidence, highways, water context, and land characteristics together on a shared map.
Compare distances to transmission, substations and mapped fiber, then review zoning and recorded property details for each location.
One process, from corridor to project.
Start with parcel and infrastructure measurements, check the applicable land-use rules, then request project-specific service and property records.
Map the opportunity.
Compare parcel scale and infrastructure relationships. Bring power, fiber, highways, and water context into the same screen so each opportunity can be evaluated on a consistent basis.
Understand the development path.
Connect the map to zoning, jurisdiction, land-use processes, and community context. Organize the policy details that shape how a project can move forward.
Plan the utility and property review.
Prepare the load schedule for the utility, route questions for carriers, demand estimates for water providers, and title and access questions for the property team.
Five locations to investigate.
Each profile includes a local map, infrastructure distances, zoning findings and outstanding diligence questions. Compare two Aurora locations with three research areas in unincorporated Arapahoe County.
Aurora East A
A recorded-site benchmark within Aurora's municipal process; availability and project approval remain unverified.
Aurora East B
An industrial comparison with close fiber context and a weaker mapped substation lead.
Quincy Industrial East
A 288-acre I-2 screen in unincorporated Arapahoe, with close power context and a material fiber gap.
Quincy Industrial West
A 212-acre screen with mixed I-2 PUD and F zoning. PUD terms and usable area require review.
Strasburg Industrial Area
A 43-acre I-1 zoning search area. Individual properties, existing uses and availability require investigation.
October 24 policy review: Arapahoe is drafting a development pathway. Standalone data centers still have no current county approval route. Read the current analysis.
Compare the five screens or open the opportunity profiles for local maps and development context.
Check jurisdiction and zoning first.
LandmAIn connects each location to its governing jurisdiction and development process. The Weld County review adds a policy layer to the corridor ranking, helping teams organize zoning, municipal boundaries, and industrial land-use pathways alongside the infrastructure evidence.
Confirm which government reviews the project and whether its code allows the proposed use. Then request utility studies, investigate fiber routes and water service, and verify access and site control.
Prepare for site diligence.
Review mapped distances, source dates and unresolved questions with the project team before committing to further studies.
- Corridor maps locate transmission, substations, highways and mapped fiber.
- Comparable site profiles list acreage, zoning, infrastructure distances and outstanding checks.
- Diligence priorities identify the records and provider responses needed for each location.
Use the findings to shortlist properties, assign follow-up research and decide which sites warrant paid studies.
Start with the site question in front of you.
Tell us about the location, project, or development decision you are working through.
Talk with LandmAIn